A un mese dall’uscita home video di Kong: Skull Island, CinemaSins ha pubblicato un video di 18 minuti in cui come al solito fa a pezzi la pellicola di turno, con la scusa di far della satira.
Ma questa volta il regista del film Jordan Vogt-Roberts è intervenuto su Twitter, dove ha ribattuto ad alcune delle presunte ‘pecche’ citate dagli Youtuber, ed ha spiegato cosa significa fare veramente della satira.
Our cinema sins video is out. What Rian said is how I feel. These videos are now the length of TV pilots – where people tell actual stories. https://t.co/dpzdWO3YXV
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
The first 7 minutes of UP reflects the entire range of human emotions. These schmucks waste 18 minutes of your life with no artistic value. https://t.co/UIXGxfmtOd
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Things like Cinema Sins simply suck the life blood of other people and are often just wrong about intent or how cinema works. It’s terrible.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Vogt-Roberts spiega che questa scena è stata realizzata per essere assurda
Things like this drive me crazy. This is meant to be absurd. Cinema Sins would ding pulp fiction for Jules and Vincent not getting shot… pic.twitter.com/Zzer9HpRM4
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
In realtà solo in 2 scene nel film piove
Literally not another scene in the film has rain in it after this. Literally two scenes in the whole film. The writing lacks Anh integrity. pic.twitter.com/AejCDrOKot
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Quando viene citato l’attore sbagliato
Are you paying attention? That’s not Shea Wigham’s character. Try actually watching the movie. pic.twitter.com/VgN9Nfhft4
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Vogt-Roberts spiega che ci sono delle canzoni che non sono state mai ascoltate prima in un film
There are songs in this movie like https://t.co/pnQ31bH3XW that have never been licensed in a film before. You can’t just say shit out loud. pic.twitter.com/lV11Nbj8Wb
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Scelta di linguaggio filmico
It’s called a match cut or graphic rhyming. So yes. I could have shown it. This is a choice that has nothing to do with a graphic shot later pic.twitter.com/aFv0k5WYoG
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
L’importanza della contestualizzazione
This “cheap laugh” got no reaction prior to the election. It gets a reaction because the black mirror of the 70’s we’re living in. pic.twitter.com/LB9NFf5qna
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Because it’s inaccessible by boat and thus only discovered when we launched satellites in the 70’s with cameras looking down at the earth. pic.twitter.com/VY54NIeO7F
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
The last one really gets me as it’s basically the entire reason the film takes place in the 70’s. This guy just says shit like trump.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Vogt-Roberts spiega di non disprezzare le critiche, quando queste sono costruttive:
I love film criticism and I love reading negative reviews if the author makes compelling and well written arguments.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Anyhow. I just wanted to point out why these videos are infuriating. They’re often just wrong or think they’re smarter than you.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
I make movies because I love film. These guys are just trolling the art form we love and profiting from it while dumbing the conversation.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 15 agosto 2017
Couple of things I want to say regarding cinema sins, the misuse of the word “satire” and a few more things. I need to put a bow on this.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 16 agosto 2017
So to those who say “IT’S A JOKE”. What is the joke really? Tell me, where are they going for the joke and stick the landing?
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 16 agosto 2017
E parlando di satira:
And NO, it’s NOT satirizing nitpicking nerd culture. Regardless of how “self aware” they pretend to be…It IS nitpicking nerd culture.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 16 agosto 2017
South Park is satire. It deeply understands and deconstructs what it’s discussing and on top of that tells you a story w/ thematic relevance
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 16 agosto 2017
As a side note, South Park does all of that in the same time cinema sins takes to accomplish nothing.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 16 agosto 2017
Honest Trailers can be satire. They actually write and perform jokes with a point of view with sense of humor unique to that brand.
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 16 agosto 2017
Red Letter Media’s phantom menace review IS satire. They lampoon a certain type of nerd culture AND their takedown is accurate & thoughtful
— Jordan Vogt-Roberts (@VogtRoberts) 16 agosto 2017
Fonti Jordan Vogt-Roberts
ScreenWEEK.it è tra i candidati nella categoria Miglior Sito di Cinema ai Macchianera Internet Awards, gli Oscar della Rete!
Grazie a voi siamo finiti in finale, ora vi chiediamo di ribadire la vostra decisione con un semplice “click”, compilando il form che trovate QUI e votando ScreenWEEK.it come Miglior Sito di Cinema. È possibile votare fino a venerdì 15 settembre 2017.
Vi invitiamo anche a scaricare la nostra APP gratuita di ScreenWeek Blog (per iOS e Android) per non perderti tutte le news sul mondo del cinema, senza dimenticarvi di seguire il nostro canale ScreenWeek TV.